RESOURCE SUPPORT FOR THE APPLICATION OF THE INDICATOR METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING THREATS TO THE ECONOMIC SECURITY OF ENTERPRISES IN THE POST-CRISIS PERIOD
Abstract
The article examines the issue of resource provision for the application of the indicator method for identifying threats to the economic security of enterprises in the post-crisis period. It also shows that economic security at the meso level is a multidimensional system that integrates economic, social, production, innovation and environmental components, and that management effectiveness depends on the ability to balance the interests of regional development stakeholders. The authors argue that in the context of post-crisis recovery, the formation of a sustainable resource potential that ensures the timely detection and neutralisation of threats is of particular importance. The indicator method is defined as a structured analytics tool that allows tracking deviations of key socio-economic indicators from normative and threshold values. A procedure for assessing the effectiveness of regional economic security strategies is proposed. The article proposes an approach to forming a system of economic security indicators for enterprises in the region, based on grouping indicators by functional blocks (macroeconomic, production, innovation, budgetary and financial, social, foreign economic and environmental). It is determined that the effectiveness of the indicator method is possible with the availability of appropriate resources – human, information, analytical and financial. The role of regional authorities in ensuring the transparency of statistical data, increasing the frequency of their updating and standardising assessment methods is demonstrated. Attention is focused on the need to integrate the economic security assessment system into the KPI mechanisms of executive authorities, which contributes to the coordination of the interests of the state, business and the population. In conclusion, it is argued that the resource support for the indicator method should be based on the principles of data openness, interagency coordination and the use of digital analytical platforms, which makes it possible to improve the accuracy of threat measurement and the efficiency of management decisions in the post-crisis period.
References
Sheffi, Y. (2021). The resilient enterprise: Overcoming vulnerability for competitive advantage. MIT Press.
Klievink, B., & Janssen, M. (2019). Realizing joined-up government: Dynamic capabilities and information sharing. Government Information Quarterly, vol. 36(4), pp. 101–114.
Illiashenko, S. M. (2021). Innovation development management of enterprises in the context of digitalization. Marketing and Management of Innovations, no. 2, pp. 11–25.
Binko, I. F. (2022). Economic security of the enterprise: Methodology of assessment. Finances of Ukraine, no. 4, pp. 55–68.
Kravchenko, I. I. (2020). System of economic security indicators: Conceptual framework. Economic Space, no. 163, pp. 23–37.
Sheffi Y. The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2021. 432 p.
Klievink B., Janssen M. Realizing joined-up government: Dynamic capabilities and information sharing. Government Information Quarterly. 2019. Vol. 36, No. 4. P. 101–114.
Ілляшенко С. М. Управління інноваційним розвитком підприємств в умовах цифровізації. Маркетинг і менеджмент інновацій. 2021. № 2. С. 11–25.
Бінько І. Ф. Економічна безпека підприємства: методологія оцінювання. Фінанси України. 2022. № 4. С. 55–68.
Кравченко І. І. Система індикаторів економічної безпеки: концептуальні засади. Економічний простір. 2020. № 163. С. 23–37.

